Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

max_content_length example value is not exemplary #8

Closed
jordan2175 opened this issue Aug 31, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

max_content_length example value is not exemplary #8

jordan2175 opened this issue Aug 31, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels
Status: Closed Done Target: TAXII-2.1 Type: Clarification
Projects
TAXII-2.1
Milestone
2.1-CSD01-WD01

Comments

@jordan2175
Copy link

jordan2175 commented Aug 31, 2017 •
edited by MarkDavidson

Section 4.2.1

The max_content_length on the API Root resource needs some clarifying text about what this field is and how to compute it. Maybe an example or two for "common" possible values. In addition to this the example has a fake value that we picked out of thin air as a place holder and never went and updated. The example of 9765625 would equal 9.313MB
@MarkDavidson MarkDavidson changed the title max_content_length description max_content_length example value is not exemplary Oct 11, 2017
@MarkDavidson
Copy link

MarkDavidson commented Oct 11, 2017 •
edited

Recommendation: change the value to 10485760, which is 10MB, add clarifying text

@MarkDavidson
Copy link

Consensus is to change value. Proposal with the most consensus was 100mb.

@jordan2175
Copy link
Author

Added text in 4.2.1 and fixed the example. Please review.

@jordan2175 jordan2175 added this to the TAXII-2.1-CSD01 milestone Feb 22, 2018
@jordan2175 jordan2175 added this to Done in TAXII-2.1 Feb 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Status: Closed Done Target: TAXII-2.1 Type: Clarification
Projects
No open projects
TAXII-2.1
  
Done
Milestone
2.1-CSD01-WD01
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@MarkDavidson @jordan2175