You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the 2.0 specification we talk about the server returning the total number of results. It is felt that this is not super clear. Does this mean the number of records in the collection or the number of records that match a certain query. All it says is "in a result set". If we keep this in our new pagination style, when that is designed, it should probably be made to be optional and it should probably be the total number of objects / items in the collection, not the number of objects that match the current filtered query.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can this issue be clarified? I'm not clear on what it means. Perhaps something like "Text describing number of results is unclear", and a link to or quotation of the unclear text.
We discussed this on the working call on 2018-02-20 with the following 15 TC members (Bret Jordan, Trey Darley, Chris Ricard, Christian Hunt, Dan Dye, Dave Lemire, Drew Varner, Efrain Ortiz, Gary Katz, Jane Ginn, John-Mark Gurney, John Wunder, Nicholas Hayden, Paul Patrick, Rich Piazza). The consensus on the call was that it probably should be the number of objects that match the query or filter that was provided. However, we need to do some more investigation on this once we redo our pagination style. I think if we do keep this, with our pagination changes, then we should probably make it optional for the server to implement.
In the 2.0 specification we talk about the server returning the total number of results. It is felt that this is not super clear. Does this mean the number of records in the collection or the number of records that match a certain query. All it says is "in a result set". If we keep this in our new pagination style, when that is designed, it should probably be made to be optional and it should probably be the total number of objects / items in the collection, not the number of objects that match the current filtered query.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: